Category Archives: Law

Government is a Business (Part 2)

If you haven’t read the post Government Is A Business (Part 1), I would suggest reading it before delving into this post.

For those that are caught up, let’s jump to year 1917,  where USA Inc. entered World War I and passed the Trading With the Enemy Act. The following year, President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, however the Electoral College elections are required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Congress. Instead, only USA Inc. corporate Senators allowed to participate in the Electoral College elections. President Wilson was re-elected as President of USA Inc., not President of the United States of America.  Remember, we do not have an original jurisdiction government as of right now.

Fast forward to 1933. USA Inc. is bankrupt, which forced a “banking holiday” and people had to trade their money-backed Federal Reserve notes to “legal tender” Federal Reserve notes. The Trading With the Enemy Act was adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of USA Inc.

In 1935, the Social Security Act was formed to provide USA Inc. the “excess capital” to start paying some of the interest that USA Inc. owed in bankruptcy. This began where the Social Security Administration created an entity with your name in all capital letters and a nine-digit account number (your Social Security number). They inform you that the Social Security card does not belong to you and that they want the card back. If you are willing to accept the responsibility over the card you activate it by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as a fiduciary for the card’s owner (USA Inc.) and you can use the card to transact business relations for the actual card’s owner. The Social Security Administration offers the individual the opportunity of serving its Trustee capacity by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity.

Now in 1944, thanks to the Bretton Woods Agreement, USA Inc. granted the International Monetary Fund (IMF) drawing account access to the United States Treasury in exchange for the USA Inc. President acquiring control over the governors and general managers of the IMF. This made USA Inc. a foreign controlled private corporation.

Due to the fact that the individual states had to conduct business exclusively in Federal Reserve notes (which is actually forbidden according to the national and State constitutions), the states created themselves as corporations. For example, what was once known as the Texas Republic is now known as the State of Texas Inc. By 1972, every State became a corporate subsidiary of USA Inc.

So after dedicating two posts to the business of government, we must come down to one bottom line: What we know as government is not original jurisdiction government. They are foreign controlled private corporations. This means that their concern is not the people of this nation. They are only around to handle the business affairs of the government. Business has no conscience. It is only concerned with profit.

For more about the history of the American government and the law, I highly recommend this website:



Government is a Business (Part 1)

We need to be clear on something. This subject does not only apply to the U.S. Government, but to governments all over the world. This is something that has taken me some time to understand and even more time to accept, so I would not blame those that are reading this for the first time to have the same reaction that I once had. But let me just come out and say it. Government is a business that is controlled by the multi-national corporations. But in order to get you to fully understand how this is possible, we have to go back in history to 1863.

During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln declared martial law in 1863 through General Orders No. 100.  This gave the President dictatorial authority to issue executive orders. Did you just catch what I said? Let me ask a follow-up question. To the present-day, does the President issue executive orders? We all know that the answer to this question is a resounding ‘YES’. So after those two questions, what conclusion can you come to? The United States of America is STILL UNDER MARTIAL LAW and has been since 1863! So do you still believe that America is free?

The next thing that people should be aware of is The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. This act created a private corporation owned and operated by the actual government (hence why I refer to the U.S. Government as USA Inc. in earlier posts) for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority of Congress to pass any law within the ten square mile Washington, D.C.

Did you also know that USA Inc. has its own constitution (United States Constitution) as opposed to the true national constitution (Constitution for the united states of America)? The only difference between the two is that the 13th Amendment was left out of the United States Constitution. For those who do not remember what the 13th Amendment is, allow me to enlighten you:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

But isn’t the President of the United States of America considered a title of nobility? No wonder this amendment was left out of USA Inc.’s United States Constitution.

So let’s move on to the establishment of the Federal Reserve. This I actually found very interesting being the fact that I have been, and still am an opponent of it. But when I started to review the history of the country, I started to understand why this took place. Apparently in 1912, USA Inc. generated debts via bonds and it was time to repay. Unfortunately USA Inc. didn’t have the ability to repay so the debt was settled for all of USA Inc.’s assets and the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America. No wonder we don’t have the ability to print our own money.

So due to the failure to repay their debts, USA Inc. formed a business relationship with the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 where they would conduct business via notes (Federal Reserve Notes) rather than with money. Just FYI, this note is actually a debt And you thought that the Fed was a part of our national government. You silly goose you! What is also very important to know is that this is a business deal between two private corporations and didn’t involve the actual national government.

In the same year, USA Inc. adopted a 16th Amendment (in their own constitution of course) which allowed Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states. This amendment has nothing to do with our nation, people, or national constitution.

Also in that same year (1913 was apparently a busy year for USA Inc.), through Congress, the 17th Amendment was adopted, but not ratified (once again in their own constitution) which established direct election of United States senators by popular vote. So why is this an issue? Because according to the national constitution, it forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where senators are elected, let alone adopting amendment to make this the law of the land.

Fast forward to 1914. This is where all senators  elected or re-elected by popular vote were seated in USA Inc. Senate capacity only. If you think that’s something, get a load of this and never forget it. There hasn’t been original jurisdiction Senate seats ever since because neither the state Senates or state Governors appointed new original jurisdiction Senators to replace them. I can go on and on but there is so much to discuss that I will have to break this into two parts. Stay tuned for part two.


Humans Are Monsters

Yes you read that title correctly. And you know what? I agree with that statement. But Mikey, I thought you said that humanity was good and that we have to work together and combat the archons and….STOP! Yes I do remember saying all that. But before I drive my point home, I would like to share with you a comment that was left on my personal Facebook page by one of my friends:


So due to my inquisitive and curious nature, I searched through my books, found me a Ballentine’s Law Dictionary 1948 edition and found the following:

‘See monster

Wow! But as you know that didn’t satisfy me so I did what Ballentine’s said and ‘saw monster’. Here what I discovered:

 ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’

Well I’ll be! It really does say that! You know what? I agree with what this says. Hold up wait a minute! The reason why I agree is not because that’s what it says in the law dictionary, but if you pay attention to how humans act, then this definition fits humanity to a T. In this reality we act mostly in our lower nature. We war with each other, we fight each other, we hurt each other, we insult each other, we break each others hearts, we kill each other, we talk about each other behind their backs, we steal from each other, we hate people because of the color of their skin, or their religion, or their sexual orientation, and we are a bunch of horn dogs. Does this or does this not fit the nature of a lower animal? I think so.

This is why we need to ascend to our higher nature of infinite consciousness which is who we are. We are having an experience as a human being, which is a monster, but it’s not who we are in the essence of things. Once again, we must remember who we are and that we are more powerful then we were taught to believe. We also have to realize that we have the ability to rise out of our lower nature as we experience this reality as a human/monster and become infinite consciousness. Don’t become the experience. Don’t become a monster.

One quick thing about the law. Who do you think wrote it? Apparently someone who has a bad taste for humanity, since they believe them to be monsters and all. Archons anyone?